From: Rosemary Musolino <rmusolino@hcourt.gov.au>
Sent: Tuesday, 1 December 2015 4:54 PM
To: KINGSLEY FERDINANDS
Subject: Re: AMENDED REPLY - Re: REPLY - UNSWORN AFFIDAVIT - PRIVATE HEARING UNDER RULE 6.07 HCR - no.4
Dear Mr Ferdinands,
In my email sent 10 November 2015, I had written: "I note that you have amended the plaintiff's outline of submissions following my comments. I confirm that your documents are now in a form that complies with the requirements of the High Court Rules. However I would point out that if and when those documents are presented at the Adelaide Registry they will not be accepted for filing immediately, as I would propose to seek a direction from a Justice pursuant to Rule 6.07 of the High Court Rules in the first instance."
This was intended to indicate to you that while your documents appeared to be compliant with the Rules, I was not giving approval for your documents to be accepted for filing and given a file number when presented at the Adelaide Registry. The documents would have to be forwarded to me and I would intend to put them before a Justice pursuant to Rule 6.07.
I note that the affidavit you have now prepared appears to be directed to Rule 6.07 and you refer to a Rule 6.07 hearing in your email correspondence. I would point out that there is no "Rule 6.07 hearing". The documents, if and when presented, are put before a Justice and that Justice will either make a direction that the documents be accepted for filing or make a direction that the Registrar not accept the documents for filing.
Consequently your recent affidavit is not required. If you wish to present your proposed application for order to show cause and accompanying documents (which I had previously advised were compliant) then you should present those documents at the Adelaide Registry.
Yours faithfully,
Rosemary Musolino
Acting Senior Registrar
From: KINGSLEY FERDINANDS <kingsley_ferdinands2007@hotmail.com>
To: Rosemary Musolino <rmusolino@hcourt.gov.au>, KINGSLEY FERDINANDS <kingsley_ferdinands2007@hotmail.com>,
Date: 30/11/2015 01:44 PM
Subject: Re: AMENDED REPLY - Re: REPLY - UNSWORN AFFIDAVIT - PRIVATE HEARING UNDER RULE 6.07 HCR - no.4
Monday 30 November 2015
Dear HCA Registrar
I refer to the Rule 6.07 hearing.
I am in your capable hands. I have done my unsworn affidavit with regards to whether or not FERDINANDS v Chief of Defence Forces will go ahead.
If the High Court judges state that it will not then there is no problem I shall have to wait another day when the court is more moderate and conservative towards the plights of minority groups and blacks.
If the High Court judges say they wish a Rule 6.07 hearing then I simply cannot go ahead with a half baked hearing and the notice of constitutional matters must go out.
This need not be a song and dance show. The Solicitor Generals may turn up or may not turn up but at least all are notified and if submissions need be made then fine.
I am convinced as to its illegality, unlawfulness and wrongfulness as all law is evidence and not beer-talk. Thus, when evidence and facts are presented then the case ends. If there is no evidence then there seems to be inquiries, Commissions, Boards of Inquiry and Royal Commissions.
I await your response on how best to proceed.
Yours faithfully
TK FERDINANDS
From: KINGSLEY FERDINANDS <kingsley_ferdinands2007@hotmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, 18 November 2015 3:17 PM
To: Rosemary Musolino; KINGSLEY FERDINANDS
Subject: Re: AMENDED REPLY - Re: REPLY - UNSWORN AFFIDAVIT - PRIVATE HEARING UNDER RULE 6.07 HCR - no.2
Wednesday 18 November 2015
Dear HCA Registrar
I am prepared to proceed with the Rule 6.07 hearing on unsworn affidavits.
I am way too tired and exhausted to be chasing JP's and all the side stuff that goes with these applications.
I can send hard copies to registry in Canberra by overnight post if so desired for the private hearing.
I rely on the amended docs I have sent you with regards to rule 6.07.
Please keep in contact.
Yours faithfully
T K FERDINANDS
592 BRIGHTON ROAD
BRIGHTON SA 5048
No comments:
Post a Comment