CONNECT TO THE ROYAL COMMISSION

CONNECT TO THE ROYAL COMMISSION

Sent fourth time – Thursday, 17 September 2015

Attention Members of Legislative Council of South Australia 2015.

1. Hon. Michelle Lensink MLC
2. Hon. Kelly Vincent MLC
3. Hon. Tammy Franks MLC
4. Hon. John Darley MLC
5. Hon. Robert Brokenshire MLC

 

I refer to my earlier correspondence for Royal Commission into the criminal conduct of senior police in South Australia Police under Mal Hyde, and the abuse of the court’s processes to bring a racially charged and hateful prosecution in the Adelaide Magistrate’s Court in 2000.

It appears that my human rights have been violated but you have not cared about that breach.  It also appears there has been a deliberate policy to remove whistleblowers against s.5 and s.9 of the Whistleblowers Protection Act 1993 (SA) after I did make serious public interest disclosures to Mal Hyde, new Commissioner of Police in 1996.  He prosecuted me four times in five years.  Each prosecution was a fraud.  Each prosecution was dominated by perjury and false evidence.

I may seek international involvement for justice if justice has dried up in South Australia.

I understand from 1996 to 2015 I am the only police officer who has taken the laws of Parliament seriously and reported corruption whereas so many others have preserved their jobs, incomes, rank and status and turned a blind eye to corruption.  I understand that racism is out of control in South Australia Police with Mal Hyde, Gary Burns and Grant Stevens all refusing to lift a finger against senior police officers who engage in police racism.  I understand that there has been no response from you or encouragement with regards to my reporting to you of such serious matters in the State of South Australia.

What Mal Hyde, Gary Burns and Grant Stevens have done is dangerous.  No sane person can stand by their actions or remain silent, yet you have chosen to stand by them and remain silent.  You have failed to stop or even enquire into corruption under Mal Hyde, Gary Burns and Grant Stevens from 1996 to 2015.

I understand you are disinterested in racism, fraud, dishonesty and corruption in government.  I understand you have made no effort or hard work in these issues.

I understand that you are not genuinely interested in how taxpayer’s money is spent as long as there is lots of money, allowances and perks of public office for you.

I understand that you are indifferent to an independent police force and the welfare and future of independent policers.

I understand that you have no desire or will to stand up for multicultural Australia and keep quiet on matters of racism in multicultural South Australia.

Can I state categorically that this is exactly what the Premier Jay Weatherill MP and Attorney General John Rau MP expected of you?  They know that you have no willpower, or resolve or drive to fight for Royal Commission or Parliamentary Inquiry or Commission of Inquiry or anything legal except your own welfare, happiness, salaries and perks.

I can only urge to try to be human for one day before you die; and commence the fight against criminal conduct by senior members of the government in the State of South Australia.  Corruption is rife in South Australia and happens almost every day without competition.  I can only urge you have some faith in the words of the catholic way of life and the words of Jesus Christ.  It seems in these times when the world is really about to collapse there are some who still excel in racism, fraud, dishonesty and corruption and by cheating can gain great benefits at the expense of all other people in South Australia.

I understand that your continued presence in Parliament has stained the Parliament and the memories of those who served with purpose and destiny, heads bowed and with utmost respect for the laws of Parliament.

I think I have notified you of a Conspiracy to Defraud the State of South Australia.  It is sad you choose to hide and be silent and not ask questions of the Premier, Minister for Police or Attorney General as to the conduct of Mal Hyde, former Commissioner of Police and Chris Kourakis, present Chief Justice of Supreme Court of South Australia.  I believe I have also notified you of a Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice – the Hossack Conspiracy.

Firstly, the law and justice need new leadership in South Australia.  Law and justice are hopeless under Jay Weatherill and John Rau.  The final plight in this case is a weak Parliament that supports or refuses to investigate the serious misconduct of public servants and Members of Parliament.

The integrity of each member of the Legislative Council is being questioned in this situation.  It is sad that you have no respect for the word of an independent police officer.  Mal Hyde and Chris Kourakis have not broken any rules they have broken the law.  I believe that they cheated.  The evidence shows they cheated.  I believe that they perverted the law.  These men have no integrity.  I believe that these men are racist and corrupt.  They have created problems for law and every South Australia.  I believe that they seem to be unanswerable to all persons: they seem untouchable.

I believe that these men have no integrity; no truth.  For 15 years they have worked to conceal a Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice; a determined fraud.  The conduct of the Supreme Court Justices has been serious misconduct and they must be accountable for their ridiculous behaviour and utter deceit.

It is important that independent police officers are backed by all Australians to ensure fairness in the courts and prosecution.  After 15 years I believe Mal Hyde and Chris Kourakis have brought law into disrepute.  A person who knowingly issues a false summons and conceals a fraud from the courts has no shame and is dishonourable.  Mal Hyde knowingly issued a false summons in the Adelaide Magistrate’s Court.  Chris Kourakis knew of this false summons which involved the then Director of Public Prosecutions and did nothing.

Is the normal behaviour?  Is this corruption?  That is corruption is here in Adelaide.  Corrupt men have always sought power of high office and in that processed have trampled on the rights of vulnerable persons and groups.  There have been crimes of perjury and bribery to secure my fraudulent termination from South Australia Police.  The Parliament has refused to be concerned and this in itself shows the deep deep deep corruption of members of the Legislative Council.

These two men have no role in the administration of justice.  These two men must be investigated by corruption officials, charged, prosecuted and imprisoned.  I believe that by siding with Mal Hyde and Chris Kourakis you have chosen to side with all that is evil and criminal.  Again, this is sad for all the children, the women and the vulnerable in South Australia who are inexperienced with such devils and such racism.  Integrity cannot be contrived; one either has integrity in law or not.

I informed Mike Rann MP and Michael Atkinson MP: they refused to respond or recognise corruption under mal Hyde; these two men have no role in the administration of justice.

I informed Jay Weatherill MP and John Rau MP: they refused to respond or recognise corruption under mal Hyde; these two men have no role in the administration of justice.

I can only appeal to the sane Members of Parliament and the sane Members of the Legislative Council to build a new police force where men like Mal Hyde, Gary Burns and Grant Stevens who have acted immorally, wickedly and corruptly refuse to go forward and release evidence for the courts to clear my name; and men like Chris Kourakis refuse to make orders for Notice to Produce because they know these matters are the greatest corruption in South Australian legal history.

I inform you the State of South Australia issued a false summons in 2000.  It is some 15 years that have lapsed since that date and in accordance with law I am seeking eight thousand ($8,000.00) dollars per day for fraud against me.  In the interest of justice and victims of crime you should take notice of this case and all the issues and be prepared to imprison numerous legal practitioners and police officers for deep deep corruption and racism.  It was a fake prosecution and I have been swindled out of my earnings by cheats and racists.

The protection of the Parliament has not been updated.  There are senior legal practitioners and police officers who treat law with contempt: treat justice with scorn and treat minority groups an blacks with disapproval – in other words, minority groups and blacks have no role in State government and no place in the Commonwealth of Australia.  By siding with this view you show politically you do not understand the role of Parliament and the power of asking questions.

Her Majesty the Queen deplores racism.

Her Majesty’s government deplores racism.

It seems that you have allowed minority groups and blacks to endure a barrage of fraud and deceit in order to uphold and protect some weird view that white Australia is right and the White Australia policy is not dead; but alive!

It seems that the Legislative Council does not deplore racism but gives tacit consent to bigotry, racial hatred and racial prejudice.

The Royal Commission is not a court.  It is a solution to a crisis.  It makes recommendations.  The State government has a right to accept or reject recommendations.  The Royal Commission will obviously extract all materials and evidence.  When that is done I will have my name clear and a fraud will be declared.  This is the most desirable outcome of any Royal Commission into a miscarriage of justice or fraud.

Law in South Australia is unmanageable with such deep deep corruption and malpractice by certain Members of Parliament from the Labor side of politics.  I inform you that race can never be a criterion as to selection of employment as an officer in Her Majesty’s government whether it be employment or appointment.  I was appointed by an honest man, Mr David Hunt in 1986, and I was terminated by a dishonest man, Mal Hyde in 2001.

Finally, I urge you to Connect to the Royal Commission.

CONNECT TO THE ROYAL COMMISSION

Sent third time – Thursday, 27 August 2015

Attention Members of Legislative Council of South Australia 2015.

6. Hon. Michelle Lensink MLC
7. Hon. Kelly Vincent MLC
8. Hon. Tammy Franks MLC
9. Hon. John Darley MLC
10. Hon. Robert Brokenshire MLC

 

I refer to my earlier correspondence for Royal Commission into the criminal conduct of senior police in South Australia Police under Mal Hyde, and the abuse of the court’s processes to bring a racially charged and hateful prosecution in the Adelaide Magistrate’s Court in 2000.

I have reported to you as a Member of Parliament a Conspiracy to Defraud the State of South Australia.

I have reported to you as a Member of Parliament a Conspiracy to Pervert the Couse of Justice in the State of South Australia.

If the Upper House members of the Legislative Assembly are independent and impartial they will demand an explanation of the Commissioner of Police as to this fraud; and demand explanations from the Premier and Attorney General of South Australia to this outrage.

Police racism is nasty.  Police racism remains one of the most deeply questioned topics in modern policing, partly because it is the power of the individual over reaching the power of the state and his own authority.  The appointment of mal Hyde from 1996 to 2012 was albeit short but it was the most destructive period in Australian policing history.  The major questions South Australians will ask in years to come is how can a Commissioner of Police issue four false summons from 1997 to 2000 and not face Royal Commission?, what are the major flaws of the South Australian legal system including structural flaws that allows corruption to remain supreme and continual in South Australia?, and what is the responsibility of Parliament to inquire into police racism and corruption and clean up the mess?

I believe the Upper House members has ignored the reporting and rejected the reporting without calling for remedial hearings or Royal Commission.  There seems to be no uproar or indignation by the Upper House rather tacit consent of fraud and conspiracy by silence against minority groups and blacks.  This is gloomy and there appears to be no hope to break the grip that racism and corruption has upon the law, police and courts in South Australia.

I urge the Upper House members to change your mind and your position in law and Connect with the Royal Commission.

AWARENESS OF RACISM, FRAUD, DISHONESTY AND CORRUPTION IN THE SOUTH AUSTRALIA POLICE FORCE

The Upper House must be aware of all acts of racism, fraud, dishonesty and corruption in South Australia Police.  This subculture of crime within a police service is unheard of and there are no words to describe a corrupt Commissioner of Police.  Police crime is supported by all senior police officers and helps keep crime levels down as brothels and drug distribution networks are controlled by the senior police in the police service.

What is you opinion of a Commissioner of Police who fabricates evidence in court rooms?

What is your opinion of a magistrate that is dishonest and a racist?

What is your opinion of the Supreme Court Justice that does not do his job of independence and impartiality but supports the criminal conduct of the State government who appointed him?

The law in this world has changed.  It is important to recognise that the men listed all had a chance to break the Hossack conspiracy but refused.  They refused because they were corrupt and they knew how corruption worked in South Australia.

To maintain the law and order and peace there must be strong defence of the law and the courts against racism and racists that seek to dominate the courts and the law.

ACKNOWLEDGE THE PROBLEM

The first thing any decent person, business, corporation or political party does when alerted of a problem in that body is to acknowledge the problem.  To admit a problem exists means that behaviour can be addressed, assed, value added or changed.  There must be system and monitors in place that are already set up to engage the problem and can move quickly to address all issues in the problem. 

To recognise that a problem exists and the path that one is on is wrong is extremely ground breaking but unless done then one will never find out the truth.  The corrections will never be implemented because the problem was not properly diagnosed.

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE ROYAL COMMISSION

The Royal Commission is to inquire into and report upon the following matters:

1.      Did 1562/4 Constable TK Ferdinands report matters of racism, fraud, dishonesty and corruption to newly appointed Commissioner of Police Mal Hyde from 1996 to 2001?

2.      Does 1562/4 Constable TK Ferdinands reporting of such matters constitute public interest disclosures and therefore he is protected under s.5 and s.9 of the Whistleblowers Protection Act 1993 (SA)?

3.      What were the reasons as to the posting of 1562/4 Constable TK Ferdinands into the City Watch House, Adelaide;

4.      What is the relevance of Ferdinands v District Court of South Australia on these proceedings;

5.      What is the true identity of David Scott Hossack and what is his relationship with South Australia Police?

6.      Why did police investigating this case not disclose his true identity?

7.      What is the true reasoning as to the drugs in possession of David Scott Hossack at the time he was charged being lost?

8.      Why was the video used in the Adelaide Magistrate’s Court trial and prosecution so limited and restrained, and why was all the video evidence not provided to 1562/4 Constable TK Ferdinands;

9.      Why did Mal Hyde solicit and petition a statement from former prisoner David Scott Hossack?

10.  What powers did Mal Hyde possess ain law and use to attend the home of a drug dealer and seek a statement against a sworn police officer?

11.  What was the reasoning and Why was the principal witness, Sergeant Bruce Chapman not called to give evidence?

12.  Was Sergeant Bruce Chapman given opportunity to give evidence?

13.  Did legal practitioner Ian Press engage in misconduct?

14.  Did legal practitioner Karim Soeratma engage in misconduct?

15.  Did legal practitioner Jeffrey Powell engage in misconduct?

16.  Did legal practitioner Wendy Kelly engage in misconduct?

17.  Did legal practitioner Geraldine Davison engage in misconduct?

18.  What role did Solicitor-General Chris Kourakis QC play in this matter and did Chris Kourakis QC engage in misconduct?

19.  Did the former Director of Public Prosecutions Paul Rofe QC engage in misconduct?

20.  Did Commissioner of Police Mal Hyde engage in misconduct or any other criminal activity?

21.  Did Chief Inspector Alistair Thompson engage in misconduct or any other criminal activity?

22.  Have the persons listed (11) to (19) engaged in racism under the Racial Discrimination Act 1972 (Cth)?

23.  Have the persons listed (11) to (19) engaged in fraud under the Criminal law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA)?

24.  Have the persons listed (11) to (19) engaged in dishonesty under the Criminal law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA)?

25.  Have the persons listed (11) to (19) engaged in corruption under the Independent Commission Against Corruption Act?

26.  What role did the employees and appointments play in the appeal process as to efficiency and effectiveness of the appeal including the masters of the Supreme Court of South Australia and the Registrar of the Supreme Court?

27.  Did magistrate Charles Eardley SM act lawfully and properly in the 2000 AMC trial?

28.  Did magistrate Charles Eardley SM engage in any element of racism, fraud, dishonesty or corruption in the 2000 AMC trial?

29.  Did his Honour Justice Brian Martin act lawfully and properly in the appeal process of FERDINANDS V Commissioner of Police (2000)?

30.  Did his Honour Justice Brian Martin engage in any element of racism, fraud, dishonesty or corruption in the 2000 AMC trial?

31.  Should any person listed from (11) to (19) be charged with Conspiracy to Defraud the State of South Australia?

32.  Should any person listed from (11) to (19) be charged with Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice in the State of South Australia?

33.  Is the prosecution against 1562/4 Constable TK Ferdinands in 2000 AMC matter of FERDINANDS v Commissioner of Police a sham prosecution or a bogus prosecution or a malicious prosecution?

34.  Any other relevant considerations in the administration of justice that this Royal Commissioner thinks fit and proper including reinstatement, loss of wages, general damages for negligence, incompetence and fraud, and special damages for punishment against the state for engaging in deep deep corruption and fraud.

 

The terms of reference for the Royal Commission are most suitable.  Yet despite the extraordinary scale and intensity of corruption in South Australia Police the Upper House members have chosen to be silent.  The terms of reference for the Royal Commission cover the main issues.  There is tremendous danger if the Upper House members allow those listed for investigation and prosecution in the Royal Commission to escape.  The reason being is they will grow more powerful and commit greater acts of evil.  Inter alia there may be repercussions and backlash by those who have been falsely accused and false charged.  It is essential if you are civilised and brought up in a civilised manner that you do your best as a Member of Parliament and help bring a new credibility to law where the Premier, Attorney General and the Commissioner of Police have failed. 

The Premier, Attorney General and the Commissioner of Police have shown great bias.  This unfairness must be fully explained by them alone.  These men have shown the independent police of different race and colour has been abandoned.  The only thing that exists in South Australia Police is a boys-culture-club and nepotism network.

This is a great opportunity for the Upper House to exercise its administrative and inquisitorial powers of the criminal justice system.

A Commissioner of Police should be for all the people.  But when you appoint a Commissioner of Police who is racially hateful and has a senior executive group that shares his race-based policies of humiliation and denigrating minority group and black police officers in the work place, and in the courts and in the media then those racially hateful policies will be at loggerheads with majority of society.

The Commissioner of Police and the Chief Justice do not represent what is right with the law; they represent all that is wrong and hateful with law and the police force.  The same policies are produced by the same people and the same thinking.  From 1997 to 2015 no senior police officer in South Australia has inquired about the Hossack conspiracy and no senior police officer has arrested the former Commissioner of Police Mal Hyde and his colleagues in the DPP or Crown Solicitor’s office.  These men are irresponsible.  They have shown great cowardice in the face of racism, fraud, dishonesty and corruption.  They are unfit for any role in government or law, yet they remain senior police officers in South Australia Police force.  This actually shows how strong corruption is in South Australia and multiculturalism views and policies are dead; it was a lie to begin with but is surely dead now under Rann and Weatherill, under Atkinson and Rau, and under Hyde, Burns and Stevens.

This shows how the thirty pieces of silver given to each senior police officer is more valuable than ethics, principles or morality.  Money and luxury first and duty comes last!

South Australian cannot afford these types of police officers who only work for themselves and seek to pervert the law at every opportunity.  I have named Gary Burns and Grant Stevens for full investigation into the Hossack conspiracy.  The majority of Australians would want them investigated and imprisoned sooner rather than later.  The outcomes are now for the Upper House to manage if it has belief in the independent police officer and the relevance of a Royal Commission.

Integrity in law must be second to none: only a gentleman can be a police officer; not a joker, a clown or a deceiver.  The Commissioner of Police from 1996 to 2015 have proven they are collectively unfit for public office and, not fit and proper persons to handle the legal and private affairs of any individual, family, business, organisation or corporation in the State of South Australia.  They are good-time gals involved in only seeking headlines and the limelight in the Murdoch press.

CREDIBILITY OF LAW

The credibility of law cannot be compromised by any political party, individual, organisation or judicial officer.  Law must have credibility: it must be believable and trustworthy.  If any political party, individual, organisation or judicial officer seeks credibility of law but lacks the common sense of a case or issues then that person has no authority whatsoever and any decision made is not a decision of the court but complete and utter garbage.  A political party, individual, organisation or judicial officer must one key feature to exist and that is sincerity.  I feel without sincerity a political party, individual, organisation or judicial officer is just a clown without a circus.

CREDIBILITY OF THE COURTS

The credibility of the courts is manifested in the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.  It is an important position.  When a Chief Justice sides with racism, fraud, dishonesty and corruption by the State government against citizen then the courts have no credibility.

CREDIBILITY OF PARLIAMENT

The credibility of Parliament is not just rhetoric but substance.  The Parliament has a minor role and the employees and appointments of the departments and agencies of government must uphold the laws of Parliament.  If Parliament does not protect the laws then society will collapse and a new ruler with new rules shall bring security to the people and the land.

Parliamentarians can be overwhelmed by powerful figures such as the Commissioner of Police or Chief Justice but when the evidence points to the way that they are corrupt and fabricate evidence against innocent citizens then the Parliament must move heaven and hell to investigate, charge, prosecute and imprison the Commissioner of Police or the Chief Justice.  Modern laws of racism, fraud, dishonesty and corruption do not allow a corrupt Commissioner of Police or Chief Justice to simply walk around Adelaide as if they own the bloody town.  These men must face Royal Commission and the Royal Commissioner.

CREDIBILITY OF THE ROYAL COMMISISONER

The credibility of the Royal Commissioner must be a man who is independent and impartial.  He must be able to break dictatorship of law and the police and destroy those who engage in tyranny by terrorising the people.  He must be able to shape the future towards purity by proper manner and not revolution.  He must be able to impact on history and the law so that new rules and laws are brought into effect and any person who seeks to undermine the will of the parliament suffers imprisonment.  He must be able to foresee the future and prevent errors and mistakes of the past being made.  He must end the suffering and misery of victims.  The Constitution and the institutions of a state are important but there are small minded men who are juveniles who love the bordello, brothel, beer, wines and spirits more than they love God, the Scriptures, The Bible and the people.  Thus, the average person must suffer great pains and humiliations while the government lives a life of luxury based on fraud, deceit and corruption.

The culture of racism, fraud, dishonesty and corruption is beyond any principles of any man and men who are most unethical promote the underworld first before they promote justice.

I hope the Upper House can fight racism, fraud, dishonesty and corruption.  I think independent police officer deserve a lot better.

The police force is not famous for assisting the oppressed or persecuted in fact they are part of the mechanisations that seek to destroy even kills citizens of this state.  The police force relishes making persons, groups, business and organisations feel threatened.  It is time people stated there is no justification for oppression or persecution of any person or group in South Australia and people and groups should be allowed to live freely with harassment as long as they do not break the law.

I believe only a Royal Commission can resolve so many issues in one major legal proceeding and introduce all members of the Upper House to the racism and corruption of Mike Rann, Michael Atkinson, Jay Weatherill, John Rau, Mal Hyde, Gary Burns and Grant Stevens.

This group of men have something to hide and conceal and it is not just the prosecution in 2000 but many others acts as yet unknown due to the indifference or laziness or cowardice of the Upper House to grill these seven (7) men over their actions.  Is the Upper House biased?  Does it protect corrupt politicians and band together as the senior police have banded together to protect their own?  Why would any strong person bother to protect a corrupt member of their business, organisation, department or political party?  It sounds absolute bizarre and grounds for annihilation for any Royal Commissioner based on the facts.  The performance of the 7 men is in great dispute and there is great disparity.  They are senior figures that lack maturity.

An inspection of the evidence conducted by the Royal Commissioner will end this matter sooner rather than later.  The time is right today for Royal Commission as to bring a Royal Commission at any other time would have allowed so many other crooked police officers and others in the criminal justice system to escape scrutiny.  The 7 men listed are unsuitable for any role in public life: they are deceitful and utterly racist.  The Upper House must stand with the 7 men or stand against the 7 men and show their true hand.

Justice in South Australia is not at a world standard; it is feral.  For more than a decade I have tried to get materials and evidence for a lawful and proper appeal but failed.

I have tried to bring legal proceedings to show plainly corruption in South Australia only to have defendants not turn up to court for cross-examination and the courts refusing to assist justice by demanding men like the Commissioner of Police, the Premier and the Attorney General of South Australia respect the courts and the law and attend for cross-examination.  I can only organise so much but if the Attorney General’s Department is corrupt and refuses to assist with fighting racism and corruption then my hands are tied.  All these issues are for the Royal Commissioner.

If the Upper House votes for a Royal Commission be aware that no Upper House member is a witness and all they have done is facilitate a pathway for justice to the truth.  The 7 above mentioned men have not respected the law, the courts, the Upper House or me.  They do not deserve to be protected any longer.  An Upper House member must have no fear.  They must respond accordingly when told of racism and hate crimes to fully investigate.

If the Upper House would like to have remedial hearings before the Royal Commission is voted on then I am free to attend such hearings with the Crown Solicitor and Solicitor General of South Australia with all correspondence and facts before the Parliament.  These hearings will be length and be absolute as to one way or another as to Royal Commission.

It is extremely disrespectful to fabricate evidence against an independent police officer but that is what the 7 above mentioned men have done.  The issue of vicarious liability arises and the Upper House must decide upon that. 

I am seeking $8,000.00 per day from 2000 Adelaide Magistrate’s Court prosecution.  It seems the Attorney General of South Australia at the time (Atkinson) managed to get two very shady judicial officers for my case; certainly they displayed great racism and hatred for blacks in their own court room and did not even give me a chance to gather and collate materials and evidence held by the Crown.  This may be because as early as 2000 all legal practitioners in the State of South Australia and all judicial officers knew the identity of David Scott Hossack and kept his identity from the people, the media and me.  This is pure racism; and gross corruption.

There is a great challenge before the Upper House and a lot of work to do.  This is a moment of change.  The independent police officer who resisted false prosecutions and false summonses and attempts to destroy his name can be justified when the Royal Commissioner passes his judgment.  These are important proceedings both in the Upper House and the courts.  There are radicals who seek to use the power of law enforcement for evil: only the Upper House can oppose this; if it feels like it.  If the Upper House wants to turn a blind eye and allow murder, rape, arson, kidnappings, bombings, child molestation, child pornography to be concealed then that is entirely up to the individual Upper House member. 

I have promoted peace, goodwill and security to all.  I have fought the destructive behaviour of the 7 above mentioned men.  It is now time for the Upper House to decide who they support: either the Gang of 7 or me.  The courts need to defend themselves from corruption but if corruption and radicalism has been planted in the courts by the State government then law has died and fighting the courts is a waste of time, money and effort.  Corruption wins because the Upper House wanted corruption to win.  The issue is, what is the important objective of removing the most independent and impartial police officer in the State of South Australia, and possibly the Commonwealth of Australia from police service by fraud and deceit?  What is the objective?

It appears the Supreme Court of South Australia has taken sides and regardless of the facts of any case will not write an adverse judgment against the premier of South Australia or Attorney General of South Australia or Commissioner of Police.  The 7 men sought to divide police relations and investigations along the lines of race and colour.  Thus, the Royal Commissioner must have the power to further charge each man and prosecute each man for their crimes – or alternatively find them all innocent of the charges.

Again, the damages continue to rise unabated.  The damage sought is in excess of $40 million dollars.  It is a constant burden on the taxpayer and only Members of parliament can end this chaos created by Mal Hyde and supported by Gary Burns and Grant Stevens.  Only the Upper House can help the community stamp out racism, fraud, dishonesty and corruption.  The Commissioners are unable to curb racism and extremism in the police force.  They refuse to engage in dialogue and respond to correspondence.  They want to take it all that corruption can give them.

Again, I urge you to help all minority groups and blacks who have suffered abuse and fraud in the South Australian work place to be offered and afforded greater protections in law.

I hope to hear from you by Tuesday, 1 September 2015 with regards to your personal responses and feelings to the issues I have raised.  Thereafter I think the issues of the Royal Commission must be put to the court.  I find no joy whatever in attending court.  These matters are a waste of taxpayer’s time and money.  The special criminals in the police service, executive, parliament and government lap up these proceedings as they stall, hinder, thwart, obstruct and delay justice and a final verdict of racism, fraud, dishonesty and corruption every day. 

The present system is most frustrating and disappointing.  The universal accepted conception that the whistleblower will be protected is common throughout the modern world; all except here in South Australia.

Finally, I urge you to Connect to the Royal Commission.

 

 

 

 

CONNECT TO THE ROYAL COMMISSION

Sent second time – Saturday, 22 August 2015

Attention Members of Legislative Council of South Australia 2015.

11. Hon. Michelle Lensink MLC
12. Hon. Kelly Vincent MLC
13. Hon. Tammy Franks MLC
14. Hon. John Darley MLC
15. Hon. Robert Brokenshire MLC

 

The Legislative Council has proven it cannot deal with racism, fraud, dishonesty and corruption in South Australia.  The members (a) to (e) have a long way to go to join the human race and show compassion.  They are entire hateful and smothered in pure negativity.  There is little promise for young children of minority groups and blacks from achieving their full potential while members listed (a) to (e) deny access to community benefits because they despise minority groups and blacks.

A racist has a thousand excuses but a person of integrity has none.  This is the Royal Commission of the century: the courts and parliament are vulnerable to sophisticated fraud by the executive.  I have received no formal response from you or your political party on the serious issue of Royal Commission.  This is sad for humanity and sad for the Royal Commission.  The Royal Commission cannot suffer any more delays as corruption in South Australia is spreading like a wildfire.

The entire Upper House principle is to review government laws, regulations, policies and practices yet this Upper House seems to be only interested in its fortnightly salaries and perks.

The people have asked to replace the Upper House because they see the Upper House as a waste of time and money.  The Upper House is valued by some political purist and historians in South Australia especially me.  Thus, I ask each member not to let down the people of South Australia and not to pretend that racism, fraud, dishonesty and corruption does not exist in South Australia Police.

The Commissioner of Police has engaged in dangerous conduct.  The conduct of any corrupt official is unacceptable yet here in South Australia certain Upper House members are prepared to cover up the misconduct and criminal conduct of a Commissioner of Police to present a rosy view to the world that whites are clean-skins and blacks are guilty.  The failure of the Upper House to tackle sophisticated white collar criminal activity will be the failure of the Upper House.

The Royal Commission will examine all pre-trial, trial and post-trial issues.  By siding with racism and corruption the Royal Commissioner may be entitled to make recommendations against you and your party.

I ask you today for a formal response from yourself and your party, in the interest of fairness.  It is dangerous to wait, and wait and wait and allow criminals to think they are superior in law and untouchable.  The sooner the Upper House voices its collective disapproval of racism, fraud, dishonesty and corruption under Mal Hyde, from 1997 to 2012, and Gary Burns from 2012 to 2015 then the sooner trust can return to the Upper House.

Again, you show all the hallmarks of a racist; and have created a culture of recklessness and indifference in politics by lacking the necessary credibility and integrity in tackling racism, fraud, dishonesty and corruption in an unrelenting manner.  If you are embarrassed talking with minority groups and blacks then that is perfectly normal as the culture of South Australia towards minority groups and blacks is to ignore their plight and go on drinking beer, wine and champagne and having a good time while other suffer pain and misery.

Please Connect to the Royal Commission.

In the history of Royal Commissions never has the victim had to chase and chase and even complete his own Terms of Reference because of a very lazy lazy lazy Upper House.  Some say laziness is close to corruption and that Upper House members stay away from such issues because they have deep deep dark pasts that they do not want discovered.

I am not interested in your dark pasts or your idle culture of avoiding responsibility and pretending to be a great politician – I am interested in the rule of law and the abuse of law by the Commissioner of Police, magistrate Charles Eardley SM and Justice Brian Martin of the Supreme Court of South Australia.

These matters have now gone on since 2000 and the State of South Australia has issued a false summons.  If not addressed by the Upper House and the Parliament then there will be chaos.  The law for damages for serious negligence and serious incompetence has been decided and the law as per Ms Cornelia Rau case was decided that damages for Crown unlawful and illegal conduct is set at a daily rate of eight thousand ($8,000.00) dollars per day.  The Commissioner of Police knew he was acting corruptly and this scandal has been kept silent by all Upper House members and the state government.  There are several key figures involved and their involvement must be determined by the Royal Commissioner.

If you are unprepared to act then I shall seek judicial review with regards to your conduct in the Supreme Court of South Australia and whether writs of mandamus and certiorari should be issued to instigate the Royal Commission.

I hope I do not have to take such action as this is a community Royal Commission and every person is entitled to be protected from a corrupt Commission of Police, a corrupt magistrate and a corrupt Supreme Court Justice.

These are serious and urgent matters with extremely serious issues of process corruption.  It is best before any court action the Upper House wake up and undertakes its own investigation and makes its own recommendations rather than burden the courts with these matters.  If the members listed (a) to (e) has no passion for law or interest in abuse of the court’s process by senior executive of the Weatherill government then that is sad.

I am surprised by your lack of interest and response.  This is a huge matter.  Corruption in the police service is a cancer.  It removes the independence of a police officer and brings about a mob mentality where the mob rule controls the order of the day.  Thus, decisions that are plainly unfair, prejudicial and biased as seen in Nazi Germany from 1932 to 1945 are seen to be the norm, and state officer merely do they duty without thinking of the morality of issues. 

All citizens of the Commonwealth have a right to be treated equally before the law.  When there is prejudice and bias and overt racism then there is no law and all that exist is complete fraud.  All citizens must be treated fairly by the courts especially the Supreme Court of South Australia.

The Upper House has a moral obligation to inquire why a Commissioner of Police went to the home of a drug-dealer David Scott Hossack and solicited a statement: and why did he offer a drug bribe or inducement to drop his most serious drug charges in exchange for false and misleading testimony against a sworn police officer; and why, when the conspiracy was unearth by me that Hossack was a former corrupt member of South Australia South Police actually sacked by the Commissioner of Police for misconduct and corruption did he conceal the identity of the main Crown witness from me and the courts.

The damages continue to rise unabated.  The damage sought is in excess of $40 million dollars.  It is a constant burden on the taxpayer and only Members of parliament can end this chaos created by Mal Hyde and supported by Gary Burns and Grant Stevens.  Only the Upper House can help the community stamp out racism, fraud, dishonesty and corruption.

I urge you to help all minority groups and blacks who have suffered abuse and fraud in the South Australian work place to be offered and afforded greater protections in law.

Finally, I urge you to Connect to the Royal Commission.

CONNECT TO THE ROYAL COMMISSION

Attention Members of Legislative Council of South Australia 2015.

16. Hon. Michelle Lensink MLC
17. Hon. Kelly Vincent MLC
18. Hon. Tammy Franks MLC
19. Hon. John Darley MLC
20. Hon. Robert Brokenshire MLC

The Royal Commission cannot be evaded or avoided.

I have not heard from you or your political party formally as to its position as to racism and corruption in the South Australia Police from 1997 to 2015.  By turning your back on victims of crime you cause immeasurable pain and suffering to them, their families and their lives.

Mal Hyde replaced David Hunt as Commissioner of Police in 1996.  Mal Hyde was irresponsible, careless and utterly foolish and he used the Police Disciplinary Tribunal in a most insidious and corrupt manner to execute his corrupt decrees and wishes and he relied upon two magistrates in the tribunal to do his dirty work, namely Kelvyn Prescott and Richard Kleinig.  The culture of fraud and perjury was never South Australia but imported from the State of Victoria.  The abuse of court’s processes by Kelvyn Prescott and Richard Kleinig is disappointing and substandard but their conduct shall be investigated by the Royal Commissioner.  Kelvyn Prescott and Richard Kleinig readily gave up the independence of the court to side with wickedness and evil; both men showed they are deeply racist.  South Australia Police (SAPOL) as a whole has suffered because of irresponsible, careless and foolish men in charge of it.

The judgments written by Prescott and Kleinig in the Police Disciplinary Tribunal are utterly false.  Thus, a Royal Commissioner is needed to examine these judgments closely and where possible remove Prescott and Kleinig from the judiciary and seek their imprisonment for fraud.  The judgments are fabrications.  The judgments gave Mal Hyde greater esteem and power to launch an Adelaide Magistrate’s Court prosecution based on fraud.  The relationship between the Commissioner of Police and the magistrates in the Police Disciplinary Tribunal is developed corruption.  No normal ordinary person believes a word of their judgments.  It is very important the Royal Commissioner examines these matters on his way to the Hossack conspiracy.

The appointment of Commissioner of Police is about trust, faith, hope and belief in one person to lead an organisation that has constant expose to the media, courts, parliament and people and yet Mal Hyde choose a course of fraud, lies and deceit day-after-day for 15 years – amazing!!!!  The trust placed in him by the State government was abused, yet when alerted by me Mike Rann and Jay Weatherill sat back and did nothing.

When Rann and Weatherill were told of lack of independence and impartiality in the Supreme Court of South Australia and other courts they sat back and did nothing; they ignored the warnings.

When Rann and Weatherill were told that damages would apply for serious negligence and serious incompetence they ignored me; they sat back and did nothing.

The South Australian Labor Party has rewarded its little mates in the Law Society of South Australia with positions in the judiciary including magistrates, District Court judges and Supreme Court Justices.  The Australian Labor Party has perverted the laws of humankind and perverted the rule of law by having men who are criminal in nature in positions of Australian Labor Party has ensured these men pervert and thwart justice and allow the rule of law to be abused and neglected.  If the law is perverted and thwarted then the criminals escape justice and all we are left with is feral justice: judgments written by men who are dishonest and corrupt but pretending to be honest and forthright.

The Royal Commission must investigate magistrate Charles Eardley SM and place him in prison.  The Royal Commission must investigate Justice Brian Martin and place him in prison.

These two men stand accused of clandestine racism.  The shocking dismissal of my attempts to uncover racism, fraud, dishonesty and corruption were thwarted by both Eardley and Martin.  They proved they were in the back pocket of the Australian Labor Party and the Commissioner of Police [Mal Hyde] and were not independent and were not impartial.  It proves that to stoop so low as to allow the Commissioner of Police, a known racist, to bring a case of gutter racism into the court house, means simply that these two men are unacceptable choices as judicial officers in any country in the world.  The shocking judgments are entirely racists.  These two men along with Michael Atkinson and John Rau set about to deceive and trick Her Majesty the Queen, Elizabeth the Second by a series of lies, lies and more lies.  They are what are colloquially known as dirty rotten scoundrels!

These two men together are dedicated racists who think they are so funny, so damn funny conspiring with the Commissioner of Police to humiliate and defeat justice.  Unfortunately, the world is not naïve and I am not naïve and I have seen their dishonesty and corruption for what it truly is: a blight and stain upon the world of law and truth.  They sought to repress evidence and repress the truth of the prosecution.  The inappropriate conduct by Eardley SM and Martin must be investigated.  These men are entirely aggressive and hostile and unfit for roles in law.  The protection of every individual, family, business and corporation depends on not just an honest and diligent police service but a faithful and authentic Legislative Council to concerns of citizens and voters.

Are you a racist?  Do you find treating minority groups and blacks because of their race and colour of skin in a mocking, humiliating and scornful manner?  Do you laugh when quietly when migrants fleeing for their lives from poverty, religious hatred and war drown in boats in the open seas?  Do you say suffer and die you bastards, or go back and fight for your country?  Do you even care about human life?  Do you care about anything other than your ego, yourself and your investments?

These are extremely serious times and you have chosen a path of avoidance.  Are you uneasy and uncomfortable speaking with or standing up for blacks?

If this is the case, then these are attitudes of a racist and they make you feel normal.  Are you in parliament to be realistic to solve problems or just to carp and snipe at others and pretend you are above the rest?  I have not heard from you as to whether you want a perfect police service and perfect court system.  I have not heard whether you will tackle the issues at hand.

As a Member of Parliament you must get the latest data about the police service.  When the police service and senior police management have consciously decided to lie, cheat and deceive the parliament and committees then a Royal Commission is required to clear the air.  Racism in the police service is incurable.  The parliament has decided to prolong the life of racism by rearranging the Office of Commissioner of Police.  My view is changing the character of Commissioner of Police by changing the person will not work.  Racism must be explored, discovered, found out and that disease must be killed off.  The Royal Commission is based on evidence.  Issues such as racism, fraud, dishonesty and corruption are for the Royal Commissioner.

As a member of the Legislative Council you have taken the silent path and chosen to keep quiet: you have remained passive; you have suppressed evidence from the courts and public view.  This is serious misconduct if not criminal conduct.  This path that you have chosen is flawed and is badly wrong.  No sane person in government can ignore corruption but no sane person can pretend that they have not had a request for Royal Commission.  I believe you are behaving exactly how the Commissioner of Police, the Premier and Chief Justice expect you to behave.  Thus you have to decide what is more important to you, your salary and perks (your silence has been bought) or justice for all (independence and impartiality)?

I do not seek to undermine SAPOL.  The Royal Commission is not short term.  It will give strength to independent police officers and rally the police service to high levels of ethics.  The intervention of the parliament in corruption is desirable to protect all citizens.  If not then I fear and predict that there will be a catastrophe in the justice system.

I never said violence was not a daily part of the City Watch House Adelaide because it is.  Why are there locks on the jail doors?  Why not let them all out and walk freely around without punishment?  What is freedom in our society and what is punishment?

The parliament must connect with the daily life of South Australia and connect with the Royal Commission.  I urge members of the Legislative Council to disable corruption in the police service and the courts.  There are many legal practitioners that must face the Royal Commissioner and be struck off.  These men have too much power based on corruption.  The Supreme Court of South Australia is a mockery and laughing stock of the world.  The court is artificial.  It is important that the parliament recognises this and stop pandering to corrupt legal practitioners and Justices.  The international court houses would imprison each Supreme Court Justice for 25 years for Conspiracy and Fraud.  But the parliament acting inefficiently and terrified does nothing.  The court house has depreciated by siding with corruption.  All figures in the courts must be investigated and all aspects of corruption must be put to the Royal Commission.

The way forward is the Royal Commission.  I have drafted the terms of reference.  The terms of reference do not need amendment. 

I believe your position in wasting time gives racist and corrupt police officers strength.  It gives racist and corrupt legal practitioners and Justices strength.  There seems to be no hurdles for corruption in the courts and judges and Justices are exempt by their racist and criminal acts.  They have constant immunity to make damaging decisions against the community and the weight of the evidence.  They are allowed to engage in insanity and misconduct every day because they are judges.  Their very actions have seen hundreds of citizens killed by their negligence and incompetence.

This is unjustifiable.  The Royal Commission must have legal power and legal force to kill off racism once and for all.  Will you bring the Commissioner of Police into line?  Will you support the majority view of stopping racism?  Will you act with utmost honesty, integrity and validity?

A police officer must be independent and impartial.  When police officers for gangs and act illegally and unlawfully they become crime gangs and criminal organisations.  The independence of a police officer in a civilised society is the most valuable gift a society has, and no person elected, employed or appointed should ever compromise that independence.  A Legislative Council inquiry must be held immediately.  Unfortunately you have dragged your feet and dragged these proceedings out to such a degree  that questions that should have already been asked have as yet still not been asked.

I ask the question, are you prepared to stand up for independent police officers or are you a puppet and a ploy of the Premier and the Commissioner of Police.  Can you respond on behalf of all police officers who have been attacked by this gang?  Can you name the 300 police officers and all others in that gang?  Do you believe that the Australian Labor Party is a criminal organisation?

We have all seen the needless deaths of children at the hands of this Premier and Attorney General.  We have all seen his priorities to remove independent police officers and have in their place lazy, negligent and incompetent police officers.  Thus, the Whistleblowers Protection Act s.5 and s.9 does not exist in reality in South Australia.  The critical loss of the Act means that a person is prepared to remain silent and do nothing to preserve their career and salary.  I am different.  I risked my career, wealth, and salary to expose corruption by stealth and ensure justice was protected by men of integrity and those who sought to fabricate charges, fabricate evidence and submit to perjury in the courts were held to account.  Every South Australian citizen is now at risk because of corrupt police officers.

The Commissioner of Police has done significant damage to the rules of the court and laws of evidence.  Particularly by controlling all the evidence and all the witnesses the adversarial system has collapsed.  It is now a fraud and a farce.  The courts appear to be a waste of taxpayer’s money and time.  There is no hope and no future for the Supreme Court of South Australia if the court continues to mock the facts and refuse to admit evidence that actually shows significant difference to the Crown version of events.

Prosecutions by the Commissioner of Police are inherently corrupt.  He targets police officers he does not like while all his drinking mates are excused for the racist, fraudulent, dishonest and corrupt conduct.  It seems that every one is a criminal in the eyes of the Commissioner of Police except off course, the Commissioner of Police.

I remind you clearly that the former Commissioner of Police issued a false summons.  He did so because he had certain magistrates and District Court judges and Supreme Court Justices in his back pocket and these men ignored the rule of law, ignored the rules of evidence and ignored the rules of the court in a most harsh and unjust manner to return convictions by fraud.  This fraud must be exposed by the Royal Commissioner.  These judicial officers must serve time in prison for their deceit and lies.  The South Australian taxpayer does not owe corrupt legal practitioners and corrupt judicial officers a living – they belong out of law and in prison.

A false summons has been issued out of spite, racism and corruption.  The State of South Australia is vicarious liable for that false summons and all the hurt, injury and damage caused.  If you are a racist then you will find no fault with it.  If you are corrupt then you will find no fault with it.  These matters have gone on for more than 5,500 days and I am seeking $8,000.00 dollars per day for serious negligence and serious incompetence.  In real time the sums owed are forty four million dollars in damages.  The High Court of Australia has said it will not entertain ‘fantasy’ or ‘far-fetched’ damages claims, but yet in accordance with law my damages claim is not a fantasy nor is it far-fetched.  The courts will not deal with or process my documents.  The courts have taken sides.  They maintain their position and value their friendships with the Premier, Attorney General and Commission or Police more than they value the facts, truth and the law.

This State cannot afford men like Jay Weatherill, John Rau, Michael Atkinson, Mike Rann, Mal Hyde and Gary Burns.  These men have abused their powers and public office and placed their own mates in high positions in the criminal justice system to protect them from criminal actions in the courts and adverse findings as a government.  I can only hope you can settle this matter out-of-court.  The State must pay $40 million dollars in damages and many people will be affected by this.

Obviously, one of the main purposes of the Royal Commission is to investigate all police officers for corruption but also clear police officers who have been named as corrupt if in fact they are innocent and not corrupt.  Thus the Royal Commission is a good and happy Commission.  If South Australia Police becomes embroiled in a scandal then there is no question that the charges and investigations brought against me from 1986 to 2015 are nothing but racist brought by men who were gutter racists and despised minority groups and blacks.

The issuing of orders for full inquiry by the Legislative Council must be done immediately.  It is now apparent that from 1996 to 2015 each Commissioner of Police has treated parliament and the members of the Legislative Council as dummies, dills and schmucks.  Those police officers and legal practitioners that treat the Legislative Council process as a joke must be issued with summonses and warned of imprisonment for contempt of parliament.

 The parliament has a role to inquire.  The parliament must stamp its authority on the Commissioner of Police and South Australia Police.  Today, no member of parliament will challenge or defy the corrupt Commissioner of Police.  This ultimately means that parliament is about free dinners and free drinks and a lot of B-grade acting as to concerns of victims of crime; this lack of genuineness is not only show in FERDINANDS v Commissioner of Police but many many other cases across the State of South Australia.

The allegations are serious.  The damages are serious.  You may be vicariously liable and linked to corruption in years to come if you do not afford a proper standard of care.  The interest of the South Australian taxpayer comes first.  If there is wide spread corruption in South Australia Police then these people must be replaced immediately.  I urge you not to be weak.  I urge you not to be a racist. 

I have done my duty and asked for a Royal Commission.  It is the right way to deal with this matter.  I have done my duty and there is nothing left for me to do except wait.  I am waiting for decent people who do not judge people by the colour of their skin.  I hope you are a great friend of a tolerant world instead of the evil we have seen from 1996 to 2015 in the courts and in the police service.  Unfortunately, law has been contaminated by evil Justices, judges and magistrates.  In due course, these men will face prison.

Are you a deceiver?  Do you believe those who deceive Her Majesty the Queen, Elizabeth the Second should be rewarded with power and privilege or do you believe that a Royal Commissioner must examine the evidence and determine their fate?  Are you friends with corrupt senior police offices and politicians and is that why you have not acted and remained silent.

Will you Connect to the Royal Commission?  A vote for the Royal Commission is an end to corruption in South Australia in a most comprehensive manner.  It will imprison over 300 police officers, legal practitioners, magistrates, judges and Justices.  The Royal Commissioner will not only unravel racism and corruption but will process all the evidence; something that was not done in 2000 in the Adelaide Magistrate’s Court.

Please write to me soon as to a hearing date by the Legislative Council as to when you are prepared to take preliminary evidence of Royal Commission and vote.  Justice has to be fair; presently in South Australia justice is not fair - it is corrupt.  I trust as members of the Legislative Council you will not further insult independent police officers or justice and act with integrity.  The quality of law has been tarnished by unsavoury and undesirable legal practitioners who fancy themselves as the Kings and Queens of England.  They believe they are untouchable.  They believe they are superior to all persons because they have gone from crooked lawyers to crooked judges and magistrates including members of parliament.  It is time this Legislative Council stop crawling to deceit and cosying up to racism and exposes these unsavoury and undesirable persons by public inquiry.

Everything the Legislative Council knows the former Commissioner of Police Mal Hyde and former Commissioner of Police Gary Burns knows.

Likewise, everything the Legislative Council knows the current Commissioner of Police Grant Stevens knows.

Likewise, everything the Legislative Council knows the current Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of South Australia Chris Kourakis knows.

Likewise, everything the Legislative Council knows the current Chief Magistrate of the Adelaide Magistrate’s Court knows.

Likewise, everything the Legislative Council knows the current Premier of South Australia Jay Weatherill knows.

Likewise, everything the Legislative Council knows the current Attorney General of South Australia John Rau knows.

These are serious allegations for the Royal Commissioner to inquire into and handle properly.

Many of these problems are caused because men have been recruited to police service with no code of honour.  They have no dignity and have not been instructed properly. 

Rann, Atkinson, Hyde, Weatherill, Rau, Burns, Prescott and Kleinig simply are racist of the Nazi sympathization order, and care less for minority group and black persecution and harassment.  They are feral.  They love their beers and bets, and off course telling lies about other people.  You see, they are the only true honest people in the world and the rest of us are peasants and slobs destined for the garbage heap of history. 

Unfortunately they have never possessed honour; in the old days a man would suicide or resign for his betrayal but men like Rann, Atkinson, Hyde, Weatherill, Rau, Burns, Prescott and Kleinig do not see their exhibitions of racism as dishonourable rather they find racism amusing. 

Rann, Atkinson, Hyde, Weatherill, Rau, Burns, Prescott and Kleinig care little for Queen, country, law or the courts.

Rann, Atkinson, Hyde, Weatherill, Rau, Burns, Prescott and Kleinig have no interest in victims of crime or the law and their acts are those of fakes, forgerers and pretenders.

Rann, Atkinson, Hyde, Weatherill, Rau, Burns, Eardley, Martin, Prescott and Kleinig have had no proper education on how to be human, or how to be a gentleman, or how to be loyal to the law and the Queen.  Rann, Atkinson, Hyde, Weatherill, Rau, Burns, Eardley, Martin, Prescott and Kleinig are unprofessional to the core and unfit for any role in public life due to their inherent racism and slyness.

Please email me as soon as is permissible and indicate whether you and your political party will support the Terms of Reference I have provided for the Royal Commission.  [kingsley_ferdinands2007@@hotmail.com].

I hope to hear from you soon.

Yours faithfully

 

 

T K FERDINANDS

592 BRIGHTON ROAD

BRIGHTON SA 5048