Monday
30 December 2013
Officer in Charge
Senior Investigator
Independent Commission Against Corruption
ADELAIDE SA 5000
Dear Senior Investigator
Re: Trevor Kingsley Ferdinands – former police
officer – Request assistance in matters of corruption – Independent Commission
Against Corruption (ICAC)
My purpose in writing to you is to inform you that I
am involved in fighting very high levels of corruption in South Australia.
I advise you that those matters involve very senior Ministers
of the Crown in the Australian Labor Party, members of the Supreme Court of
South Australia, members of the Adelaide Magistrate’s Court and South Australia
Police.
Corruption is a mixed bag, and I for one when I
joined the police service in 1986 did not believe that there was any corruption
and any suggestions of corruption in South Australia Police was talk of madness
and lunacy.
However, from 1997 to 2001 I was the victim of four
fabricated summonses issued by South Australia Police and former Commissioner
of Police Mal Hyde. Each prosecution was
so flawed and utterly defective that each should have been declared a major act
of corruption: but none were. Each
prosecution had a summons, some witnesses, some evidence and most importantly
transcripts. Each judicial officer presiding
over each false summons has committed the offence of Conspiracy to Pervert the
Course of Justice. They have also each
committed the act of misconduct. Yet
none have been investigated or charged or prosecuted. The consequences are corruption has been
ignored. the issue of passing-off, that
is making all prosecutions routine then comes to mind as passing-off allows for
corrupt prosecutions to pass through the system along with other prosecutions
and does not alert the minds of anti-corruption agencies or law enforcement
units.
The exploitation of the justice system by unethical
and immoral conduct constitutes a cycle of abuse. That cycle of abuse starts with a dishonest
and corrupt Commissioner of Police and ends with a dishonest and corrupt
judicial officer.
Now, today I am asking for assistance in my
fight. I do not need Independent
Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) to bat for me in court or during
corruption prosecutions but rather perform tasks for me and that performance of
duty will help in the fight against corruption and clear my name.
Without detailing exactly what I want ICAC to do,
can the officer in charge and senior investigator give me some indication as to
whether they are prepared to issue warrants and seize files and arrest key persons
in the criminal justice system for misconduct and aiding and abetting a
conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.
I inform you that the people who have abused the court’s processes and the
court system are in fact senior police, senior magistrates and senior justices
of the Supreme Court of South Australia.
Each must face investigation, charges, prosecution and
imprisonment. They have been more than
incompetent or negligent in the performance of their duty but have been
knowingly and deliberately corrupt. But
I do not want ICAC to handle my corruption investigations and prosecution matters
in court because I intend to prosecute each person myself and clear my name.
I advise you in 2001 former Commissioner of Police
Mal Hyde terminated me. Since that day I
have fought hard to try to regain my position in South Australia Police. This corruption issue is known as the Hossack
conspiracy. I gather that ICAC has been
busy but has not contacted me, thus I am writing to ask do you have any plans
whatsoever to make contact or are you prepared to turn a blind eye to high
levels of corruption by senior figures in the criminal justice system.
The justice system must be impartial and those who
work within it must be independent. I
have discovered a criminal network around the Australian Labor Party and
judicial officers of the State of South Australia including the Supreme Court
of South Australia. Can you write to me
and inform me whether you have discovered such a network of deep, deep
corruption? And if not, why not?
I have also discovered a criminal network around
former Commissioner of Police Mal Hyde.
Can you write to me and inform me whether you have discovered such a
network of deep, deep corruption? And if not, why not? As part of the integrity process I wish to
inform you that ICAC presents no information to the public. Thus, I and possibly 1.5 million South
Australians do not know exactly what you do and how you do it, and whether you
are sincere and mature in what you do.
Is ICAC able to assist the High Court of Australia
to obtain materials and evidence of corruption and clear up the face of the
public record and in doing so exposing the factual record that shows senior
figures in the State of South Australia engaged in corruption?
These matters are serious matters. They do not require confidentiality as all
matters are to be placed before the courts.
I do not need the Director of Public Prosecutions or Solicitor General
of South Australia to assist me as both are implicated in this matter of deep,
deep corruption as are the new Commissioner of Police, the Chief Magistrate of
Adelaide and the Supreme Court of South Australia. Are you able to apply the relevant law and
policies of ICAC and provide assistance in gathering and collating materials
and information for use in other court proceedings?
The issue for the senior investigator is good
corporate governance and not trust. To
prevent corruption and tackle corruption head-on and senior investigator must
be prepared to do all; without exception.
Thus, what are you prepared to do to expose corruption in South
Australia and the Australian Labor Party?
It is my belief that the new Commissioner of Police has offered and
afforded protection to criminals involved in corruption in the abuse of the court’s
processes. Thus, this criminal
established by Mal Hyde flourishes under Gary Burns.
As senior investigator are you capable of taking the
lead and interview Gary Burns on the Hossack conspiracy? As senior investigator are you capable of taking
the lead and interview Mal Hyde on the Hossack conspiracy? If you are able to do so then you can send me
a copy of those interviews and I shall attach them as evidence to a High Court
of Australia application. As senior
investigator are you capable of taking the lead and interview the Chief
Magistrate of the Adelaide Magistrate’s Court on the Hossack conspiracy? As senior investigator are you capable of
taking the lead and interview the Minister for Police on the Hossack
conspiracy?
The principle of honesty and integrity in ICAC
simply means that every dirty little secret of Mal Hyde and Gary Burns must be
exposed and put to the courts. Are you
willing to do this?
The Hossack conspiracy is not innocuous; it is deep,
deep corruption. The prosecution was
unfair and unreasonable. Much of the
evidence sought was withheld by legal practitioners from the Director of Public
Prosecutions office namely Paul Rofe QC, Ian Press, Karim Soetratma and Jeffrey
Powell. There was much information they
did not divulge to the court. I
discovered a bribery and drug-conspiracy in the AMC prosecution. This bribery offer was an inducement for
Hossack to enter court and give evidence, all be it false and misleading
evidence. He took advantage of the offer
made to him by Mal Hyde. He exchange was
to secure a conviction by fraud.
Thus, the s.42 Notice of Termination under the
Police Act 1998 (SA) issued by Mal Hyde on 22 November 2001 is fraudulent (and
voidable in law – meaningless) and should be revoked; only once the evidence of
the main Crown witness has been established.
The s.42 Notice of Termination under the Police Act 1998 (SA) issued by
Mal Hyde on 22 November 2001 is a false notice.
The AMC matter is a race-based prosecution and termination.
As senior investigator you must determine a course
of action. In my mind, the easiest
course of action is to issue arrest warrants and seize documents and charge all
persons mentioned above with racism, fraud, dishonesty and corruption offences
especially misconduct under each persons appointed Act of Parliament and
further charge with aiding and abetting a conspiracy.
The second option is simply issue warrants for the
seizure of all documents from the above mentioned persons and then form you own
opinions and then form a committee to work out who should be charged with what
and why and also issue suspension notices for all persons. These matters must be recorded accurately
thus I cannot do any work for ICAC because I am already involved in litigation,
however the above mentioned persons have materials and evidence in files and
documents and have refused to release them, thus in my mind, ICAC should be a
little helper and help the superior appellate courts for being misinformed or
misled by the Crown Solicitor by providing all documents.
If ICAC can oversee the securing of all documents
then that would be wonderful. I inform
the senior investigator that I have in the past tried under FOI laws to get the
documents and materials but the judges of the District Court of South Australia
refused to and failed to assist me. This
in itself is a major investigation for ICAC however I have not made an official
complaint and I do not believe I ever will because these judges choose to act
corruptly in office and extend my humiliations, pain and suffering by engaging
in racism, fraud, dishonesty and corruption.
They have protected and concealed from 2000 to 2001the identity of David
Scott Hossack, and the fake/false summons issued by Mal Hyde.
In my mind, if ICAC has any ethical policies or
practices then the first policy must be “Is prepared to assist the courts and
other law enforcement agencies by overseeing and aiding investigations; that is
provide man power and resources to on-going corruption inquiries and
prosecutions”.
If there is a conflict of interest in ICAC then that
needs to be identified to me quickly. If
ICAC sees the above mentioned persons as friends then ICAC has already been
deceived and is a toothless tiger, and I shall not waste my time with ignorant
people who think racism and corruption is a joke. The above mentioned people, if ICAC is hard
lined and plays hard ball, will be suspended from public office forthwith, and
interviewed and charged with misconduct.
The state Labor Party has failed all South
Australians and the Ferdinands family.
The justice system is littered with dregs and sludge of society and
there does not seem to be an honest judicial officer in South Australia. For 12 years every judicial officer has known
about the Hossack conspiracy and done little.
The system prior to ICAC was poor and failed many South Australia with
Police Complaints Authority and Internal Investigations Branch working
hand-in-glove to persecute good hard working decent police officers and drive
them out of police.
This process was not bullying but actual corruption
and using the court’s processes to remove police officers by false summonses
and exaggerations or lies as to events and incidences. This was total fraud.
Two magistrates come to mind who actively
participated in this fraud are Kelvyn Prescott and Richard Klienig. They supported the corruption of Mal Hyde and
abused the court’s processes. In fact,
they entertain the dishonesty and fraud of Mal Hyde in exchange for promotions
and benefits in law. This process is
designed to kill the police officer or force a suicide or termination or
resignation. ICAC is a new system but
does not protect anyone or anything. It
is a failed system on top of an even greater failed system.
Thus, as senior investigator you have to show the
world and me whether or not you can secure the documents and gather the
evidence, then copy that evidence (in its entirety) and pass it on to me, so
that I may present it to the High Court of Australia (HCA) and return to South
Australia Police as a police officer.
Mal Hyde and his cronies are largely irrelevant. He fostered illegal activity from 1996 to
2012. The world of dishonesty and
corruption they created for themselves was a mean, selfish, egotistical cruel
world where only they and their closest friends lived lavishly and all others
had to struggle without support. I had
no support in 2001 from Mark Carroll or Peter Alexander. I guess they also wanted to create a world
where they were just friends with Mal Hyde and like empty-minded fools merely
went along with all he said and did, and never made a protest or said boo. They ensured there were no adequate
safeguards to protect police officers who were persecuted. I have no doubt that they knew full well the
Hossack conspiracy and till today keep silent on it.
As senior investigator I trust you can strengthen
law and order, and serve justice. The
issue before you is not a wrongful conviction obtained in corruption and fraud
by Mal Hyde and others in a wide corruption scandal. Rather, the issue before you is, can you
assist and oversee a High Court of Australia application involving corruption
and corrupt characters who are deeply deceitful and corrupt. Can you serve justice by overseeing a
corruption matter and providing assistance in a corruption case? That is what I am awaiting in your answer.
I advise you that the prosecution in 2001 in the AMC
was brought in malice, fraud and corruption and served no lawful purpose other
than to tickle the funny bone of the dedicated and hard lined racist in South
Australia legal fraternity and the Law Society of South Australia who are
B-grade actors to the core, and only serve themselves.
If you need special approval to issue warrants
seizing documents then obtaining special approval forthwith. The complete and full files in the Supreme
Court are most lawful and valid to my case and your involvement; as are letters
to Gary Burns from myself; as are letters to the Chief Magistrate from myself;
and as are letters to Minister for Police from myself. Alternatively, if you are going ahead with
arrest warrants and removal of the disease from society of the above named
persons then email me:
kingsley_ferdinands2007@hotmail.com
and consult with me as to what you should be doing
and how….don’t just go off half-cocked and do rubbish things because you may
make trouble for yourself and destroy a legitimate corruption investigation and
prosecution. When questioning potential
offenders, ensure that you put everything to them especially their acts,
omissions and their line of thinking and thoughts. The evidence of their conduct must be
polarised as misconduct not left be left to any doubt. As senior investigator you must examine each
file carefully and each page doubly-carefully.
As officer in charge and senior investigator you will need to interview
the top 20 senior police officers in South Australia Police and determine
exactly who knew what, when and where and why did not one police officer from
2001 to 2013 move to arrest Mal Hyde for Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of
Justice.
Those statements are crucial to the High Court of
Australia to determine whether many police officers in South Australia have
been rewarded for their silence over the years in corruption and whether or not
the top 20 should be sacked for corruption by the High Court judges for
omissions and utter incompetence. If
they are deserters and cowards then they should be sacked forthwith by the High
Court judges simply because they have no idea of law, or justice or issues of
corruption.
If you have determined to question each of the above
named potential offenders then you must ask:
Questions:
Prior to the arrival of senior investigators from ICAC, when you
received this letter from former police officer Trevor K Ferdinands, how did you
deal with it? How did you record
it? Where did you record it? Did you report it to any other person or
persons within your command or control?
Did you report the matter to the Attorney General of South
Australia? Did you report the matter to
the Minister for Police? Did you report
the matter to ICAC? Did you attempt to
make contact with former police officer Trevor K Ferdinands?
Second line of Questions: Prior to the arrival of ICAC today what
intent did you have as to the contents of the letter or practices are in place
in the workplace with dealing with such letters, and what actions were you
going to take? How are letters and
correspondence such as these recorded, monitored and tracked in the system?
Third line of Questioning: In your own words, do you understand what
racism is? Please explain it. In your own words, do you understand what
fraud is? Please explain it. In your own words, do you understand what
dishonesty is? Please explain it. In your own words, do you understand what
corruption is? Please explain it. Did you act differently when you received the
letter from former police officer Trevor k Ferdinands?
Fourth line of Questioning: What policies do you have in the workplace to
fight corruption? Please present those
policies and any other information including programs, teaching aids, pamphlets
and databases for inspection and consideration.
I ask you, as senior investigator are you able to
review the ICAC legislation, policies and practices and determine whether you
can assist me and others (HCA) in the fight against corruption in South
Australia, or can you only be involved in the fight against corruption in South
Australia once a complaint has been made to ICAC?
The review should take 28 days including gathering
all files and evidence then sorting evidence.
The assessment to arrest should take 28 days including what charges are
to be laid and against whom including judicial officers of Supreme Court of
South Australia. Thus I hope to hear
from you on or about Monday 24 February 2014.
Decency and professional standards dictate that you work independently
and objectively. I expect full
professionalism and competence from ICAC.
GENERAL
WARNING
If ICAC discovers other issues of corruption while
investigating this case but unrelated to this case, then ICAC is free to do
whatever it so desires with that evidence and materials but I cannot direct
ICAC to make arrests or make inquiries as to other matters unrelated to this
case if ICAC does not have a heart or in fact, it possesses a Devil’s
Heart. Thus, I shall leave the next 8
weeks in the capable hands of the senior investigator in ICAC and rest assured
I never reported my concerns, namely these concerns to Police Complaints
Authority, Internal Investigations Branch, Anti-Corruption Branch or the Fraud Squad.
The s.42 Notice of Termination under the Police Act
1998 (SA) issued by Mal Hyde on 22 November 2001 is a false notice and not one
of the law enforcement agencies, units or branches mentioned above can discover
that very fact when the evidence is right under their noses: thus, my
assertions that South Australian are unprotected is well founded. In the alternate, all of the law enforcement
agencies, units or branches mentioned above are corrupt!
In this world of corruption the corruption authority
must determine what is corruption and how does it relate to private gain,
benefit, advantage, advancement, improvement and achievement. In my case, the ICAC senior investigator must
determine where is the private gain from issuing a false summons and securing a
conviction in fraud; a conviction that shall be overturned because it is a
wrongful conviction. I have done all I
can – the rest is up to you.
If ICAC is considering questioning the Premier Hon
Jay Weatherill MP as to why he refused to and fail to renew the contract of the
Commissioner of Police Mal Hyde, then ICAC must be armed with all the materials
and evidence of the Hossack conspiracy and ask the Premier, “Was Mal Hyde
sacked or failed to be reappointed because of the Hossack conspiracy and the
termination of Constable Ferdinands? The
answer must be detailed. Good and
sufficient reasons must be provided by the Premier as to why Mal Hyde was not
reappointed. If there is a corruption
scandal looming or a corruption scandal in tow and is being suppressed by the
Premier then ICAC and the people have a right to know. The former Commissioner of Police was doing a
fine job by all apparent means and methods; thus, ICAC must ask why was he not
offered a new contract? Was he corrupt? Is there another corruption case
looming? The answer provided may be
directly relevant to the High Court of Australia application. Is there any new information behind the
scenes that this case is not aware off or that High Court judges are not aware
off?
The only thing I ask of ICAC is transparency. By being both clear and concise in the
Hossack conspiracy ICAC can gather materials and information and the High Court
judges can then make a full determination on the appeal. There shall be no judicial orders or
provisions whatsoever for ICAC or the judges to take into custody potential
perpetrators and offenders of corruption crimes.
South Australia suffers from justice
insecurity. This means justice is both
scarce and infrequent thus; many are threatened by the way certain rogue police
officers work in conjunction with rogue judicial officers using threats and
intimidation. What they do collectively
together is called Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice. On some occasions the courts shall stand up
for minority groups and blacks but again those occasions are infrequent and
intermittent. To ensure justice security
you are required to arrest for serious misconduct and corruption the following
persons:
- Gary Burns,
Commissioner of Police;
- Chief
Magistrate of Adelaide Magistrate’s Court;
- Minister
for Police, Hon O’Brien MP and;
- Attorney
General of South Australia, Hon John Rau MP.
By law and all international standards you shall
take them into custody within 24 hours of receiving this letter and issue
warrants to seize my all files and letters from 1996 to 2013 held by South
Australia Police, Supreme Court of South Australia, District Court of South
Australia, Police Disciplinary Tribunal, Adelaide Magistrate’s Court and,
Office of the Minister for Police, and finally, the Attorney General’s
Department to uncover, discover, and break the Hossack conspiracy.
When you make a conscious decision to take into
custody all those who have omitted to act and save the face of the public
record, and failed to disclose the conspiracy to remove Constable Trevor K
Ferdinands from lawful employment and the career of his choice, you arrest them
because they are active agents in corruption and not because of some mercy
shown to minority groups and blacks.
A fraud once acted out must be fully investigated
and prosecuted by the authorities of the state and when they authorities of the
state refuse to act with promptness and due diligence or fail to act because of
love or friend relationships between law enforcement and the accused persons
then the world is entitled to ask, “Who do they think they are?” That is, are they above the law and can act
with impunity and destroy minority group and black lives by false allegations
and trumped-up charges.
The abuse of the justice system by corrupt
authorities demands action and end to all abuses of fake and false summonses.
By right and common decency, any persons issued with
suspension notices that I have mentioned, those suspension notices must be
copied and sent to me for my file work and the information of the courts
including the High Court of Australia.
If summonses are issued or warrants to seize all documents and
materials, likewise, copies must be made and sent to me so I can keep High
Court judges well and truly informed as to what you are doing, have done and
plan to do in the near future to repair the face of the public record and set
aside this serious miscarriage of justice caused by racial gratification.
RACIAL
GRATIFICATION
A racist is a racist: there are two types of racists
that exist within the Commonwealth of Australia; first, the racist that denies
hope and opportunity for employees to grow and develop and ignores and isolates
minority groups and blacks in the workplace, and second, the racist who constantly
stalks and harasses, annoys, pesters, fabricates stories or events or evidence
against that person in the workplace and threatens their careers, finances,
promotions and reputation.
A racist suffers a mental disorder and does not have
a choice in being a racist because they are born like that and it is natural to
them to exploit any power relationship over any minority group or black
person. A racist cannot stop being a
racist; the abuse stops wen the minority group or black person is out of mind
and out of site, and possibly out of the job the sought and gained in equal
opportunity with other candidates for that position or vacancy.
A racist cannot be healed and they enjoy the pain
and suffering caused to their victims by bullying, threats, stalking and
harassment.
A racist has poor think and decision-making patterns
and they only think of themselves first as a means of survival. They have no strategic value to an
organisation.
A racist is clumsy, careless, uncaring and
inept. It is easy for any minority group
or black person to identify an act of racism against themselves or in general.
An act of racism cannot be argued or defended; a
failure to act against racism cannot be excused or justified.
Racial abuse of any minority group, or black or
Aboriginal Australian person cannot be tolerated and is totally unacceptable
whether committed by police officers, law enforcement or judicial officers of
the State of South Australia; and if such racial abuse does take place in the
name or guise of corruption then ICAC shall intervene and investigate and
prosecute all offenders and perpetrators for such acts of racial abuse. The culture of racism by police officers, law
enforcement or judicial officers of the State of South Australia must end.
The denigration and humiliation of minority groups
and blacks by persons named and listed in this case is part of their racial
gratification, and they enjoy seeing minority groups and blacks suffer. The above named and listed persons had a duty
and responsibility in law to act. Each
could have acted and set the face of the public record straight. Each failed to act. This lack of accountability makes the culpable
to crimes against corruption caused by racial abuse and racial
gratification. Each has intentionally
played a role in upholding Mal Hyde’s false/fake summonses.
The activity of racial gratification is designed to
stereotype minority groups and blacks in a poor light. The abuse of trust and abuse of power by Mal
Hyde is a serious offence.
Racial gratification is to look down upon a person
with an evil eye swelling in malice, ill-will and hatred of that person due to
their different race and colour, and treat them in a most shameful and
disgraceful manner in the services offered and provided by and of government or
private industry.
There is sufficient evidence Mal Hyde issued four
fake/false summonses from 1997 to 2001.
He did so because he wanted to demonstrate his power over the judiciary
in South Australia. Both Mal Hyde and
judicial officers shared a trace racist element in that is did not matter what
the evidence was at a trial, if the accused was a minority group or black
person they would be convicted; thus, a serious miscarriage of justice would
transpire because of the high degrees of racism and corruption shared between
Mal Hyde and judicial officers.
The misuse of power and abuse of discretionary
authority makes Mal Hyde unsuitable for any role in the justice system. The neglect of duty and sheer favouritism
shown by certain judicial officers makes those judicial officers unsuitable for
any role in the administration of justice, and law itself.
The justice system is weak because corrupt judges
show their weakness when faced with corruption issues with senior police and
government figures. The system controls
of corruption are manifested in men; not machines. Thus, the system is prone to corruption and
fraud. Corruption per se does not
attract damages in a civil law claim for damages but fraud on the other hand is
highly likely to attract damages if fraud can be shown and proven. If the Attorney General of South Australia
has appointed persons to the judiciary that he knows are weak and can further
weaken the justice system then justice suffers and is set backward as many
cases brought before the courts avoid the primary fact evidence and the defence
of the plaintiff or the accused.
Thus, a scenario of a bushfire is now created by the
state Labor government whereby the system of controls instead being strong at
the magistrate’s level, and stronger at the District Court level and strongest
at the Supreme Court level is weak throughout and all judicial officers serve
the will of the Attorney General of South Australia instead the evidence and
the face of the public record. The role
thus is now for the judiciary to remove the plaintiff or accused as a threat or
some person serious in law by claiming the plaintiff or the accused is vexatious
or malicious or suffers from a mental disorder.
Thus, corruption has won because anti-corruption
serves the corrupt and does not serve the evidence or the face of the public
record.
ICAC must determine which the weak links in the
chain of justice are and who are close friends of the Australian Labor Party
and remove them from the independent roles required of barristers, solicitors,
magistrates, Judges and Justices. It is
inconsistent with the oath of office and oath to the courts by barrister,
solicitor, and magistrate, Judge or Justice to be friends with a political
party or elected member of government including Australian Labor Party, Liberal
Party of Australia, No Pokies or The Greens.
In corruption, to be independent is to be
independent of all conflicts of interest and not to be self-governing or a law
unto one’s self that is answerable to no person. In fighting corruption ICAC along with other
anti-corruption agencies and units can easily be duped and have been duped,
thus in corruption, ICAC can have no friends and to have friends simply means
ICAC is irresponsible, immature and gravely naïve.
Finally, today, the above named and listed persons
are laughing in the face of ICAC because they have got away with serious crimes
of racism, fraud and corruption.
I have waited for a special invitation by ICAC; none
has been forthcoming.
Thus, I ask ICAC are you able to exercise your
powers and authority to assist in overseeing serious corruption matters by
gathering and collating evidence for the High Court of Australia, or will ICAC
only be activated on a formal complaint and then take over all aspects of the
case. If ICAC takes over a case then it
will disrupt my case and plans that I have spent thousands of hours on since
1997. I have four major corruption cases
to be prosecuted and all are based on the four major fake/false summons issued
by Mal Hyde in racial gratification.
I do not know of any other case that involves the
arrest and imprisonment of many senior figures in law and up to 30 police
officers. I have identified a criminal
network in South Australia Police created by Mal Hyde. It may be that this network has not been torn
down by Gary Burns. It may be that the
Police Disciplinary Tribunal and Adelaide Magistrate’s Court are still be used
as tools of corruption to remove decent hard working police officers because of
gross exaggerations, race, colour, personality or political views.
I refuse to be careless or negligent in such serious
matters and this case does require some outside assistance and support to get
it moving a little bit faster….after 12 years.
Always remember this, Mal Hyde desired my removal from South Australia
Police by a series of false and misleading allegations and evidence; and Gary
Burns instead fully investigating the matters and revoking the s.42 Notice of
Termination aided and abetted the deception of the people and the courts in the
Hossack conspiracy. He desired my
removal by any means and methods including all illegal, unlawful and wrongful
means and methods including perjury by other police officers.
Gary Burns had a duty and responsibility to a ton
stance on anti-corruption strategy and measures; and he has failed. His approach is a complete misunderstanding
of law and justice. The protection of
the innocent supersedes and surpasses the protection of friends and mates in
law enforcement and the justice system who have been accused of misconduct,
fraud and conspiracy. Gary Burns had a
duty to stand up for the foot soldiers in South Australia Police but he
abandoned them. He chooses friendship
and evil over truth and justice. That
was his decision, which was his evil decision.
I am determined to fight racism in South Australia
Police.
I am determined to fight fraud in South Australia
Police.
I am determined to fight dishonesty in South
Australia Police.
I am determined to fight corruption in South
Australia Police.
My return to South Australia Police is
imminent. The fraud acted against me in
2001 will not be upheld by any decent court house or any international court
house of law because the main Crown witness is a paid up agent of the Crown who
has been bought lock stock and barrel for his false and misleading
testimony. This is not the way justice
works in a civilised society but a feral society made up of feral police
officers, feral government Ministers and feral judicial officers.
Again, I have done my bit – the rest is up to you.
I inform you that I am a nomination for Commissioner
of Police in the State of South Australia at the next available moment and if
and when a vacancy arises, thus the clearing up of these matters and setting
the face of the public record straight is not only in the interest of the
people of the State of South Australia but in the interests of justice. No person shall be rewarded for acts of
corruption and no person shall sail off into the sunset having committed vast
acts of racism, fraud, dishonesty and corruption and think that they have got
away with all their crimes and misdemeanours.
These are very serious times for ICAC and I trust
you are a serious person.
Yours faithfully
TK Ferdinands
592
Brighton Road
BRIGHTON
S.A. 5048
No comments:
Post a Comment