CORRUPTION IN THE MIKE RANN YEARS - CORRUPTION IN THE STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA

KINGSLEY FERDINANDS IS SEEKING OUT ANY PERSON WHO MAY HAVE BEEN SUBJECTED TO RACISM, FRAUD, DISHONESTY OR CORRUPTION IN THE PAST WHEN MIKE RANN AND MICHAEL ATKINSON WERE IN POWER AS PREMIER AND ATTORNEY GENERAL IN THE STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA.

PLEASE MAKE CONTACT WITH KINGSLEY at:  kingsley_ferdinands2007@hotmail.com

RUPERT 'THE PHONE-HACKER' MURDOCH - UP TO HIS OLD TRICKS AGAIN

RUPERT

RUPERT 'THE PHONE-HACKER' MURDOCH - UP TO HIS OLD TRICKS AGAIN.

PRINT THE NEWS RUPERT, NOT SPEND ALL DAY MAKING UP THE NEWS AND THEN SEEKING A HOLLOW APOLOGY IN THE COURTS OR A MEDIA INQUIRY!!!!

WORLD RACISM CONFERENCE ON RACISM IN THE SOUTH AUSTRALIA POLICE FORCE

WORLD RACISM CONFERENCE.

RACISM IN THE SOUTH AUSTRALIA POLICE FORCE FROM 1996 TO 2012.

KINGSLEY FERDINANDS will speak on racism in the force.  Hear Kingsley speak by email kingsley_ferdinands2005@hotmail.com and finding out all the details.

THE POLICE SERVICE THAT IS RACIST CANNOT SUPPORT A COMMUNITY BECAUSE OF ITS PREJUDICE AND BIGOTED VIEWS HELD BY MANY, MANY POLICE OFFICERS.

FIGHTING CORRUPTION IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA....everyday

call KINGSLEY FERDINANDS, and discuss all issues you may be having related to corruption in the State of South Australia, especially the Judiciary, the police service and the Law Society of South Australia.

contact:  kingsley_ferdinands2005@hotmail.com

CORRUPTION KILLS HOPE.

CORRUPTION KILLS OPPORTUNITY.

CORRUPTION KILLS INVESTMENT.

Let clean up South Australia together.

THE EYES OF GERMANY ARE UPON FERDINANDS!!

-#

www.courts.sa.qov.au

COURTS ADMINISTRATION AUTHORITY

Supreme Court Registrar's Office

1 Gouger Street, Adelaide SA 5000

(DX Box No 458)

Telephone: OB 8204 0289

Facsimile: 08 8204 8448

I August 2014

Mr TK Ferdinands

592 Brighton Road

BRIGHTON 5048

Dear Sir

PROPOSED ACTION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW

I acknowledge receipt of the documents lodged with your letter of 23 July 2014.

As it appeared to me that the documents constituted an abuse of process within the

meaning of Rule 53 of the Supreme Court Civil Rules 20061referred them to a

Master of the Court.

The Master has directed me to reject the documents. I return them with this letter.

The documents are an attempt to re-litigate matters that occurred more than 13 years

ago through the vehicle of a request to the Commissioner in May this year for a

review. That is an abuse of process.

ACHTUNG PANZER!!!!, ACHTUNG FERDINANDS!!

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA  

ADELAIDE REGISTRY                                                                            No.              of 2014

 

 

 

BETWEEN:                                                                 TREVOR KINGSLEY FERDINANDS

                                                                                                                                      Appellant

 

                                                                                                                                                and

 

                                                                                                 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

                                                                                                                                 Respondent

 

AFFIDAVIT / AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE

 

I, Trevor Kingsley Ferdinands, of 592 Brighton Road, BRIGHTON S.A. 5048, former police officer, say on oath as follows:

 

1.    This matter is about the powers of the master to call for a hearing and hear greater evidence and make orders for the release of evidence so that the current appeal in Ferdinands v South Australia Police can go forward and all members of the Australian law courts may have an opportunity to set the face of the public record straight.

2.    On the 8 August 2014 the proposed action for judicial review was refused. 

3.    The Registrar states, “It appears to me that the documents constituted an abuse of process within the meaning of Rule 53 of the Supreme Court Civil Rules 2006.  The documents were referred to the master.

4.    The master directed the documents be rejected.

5.    The master did not give any reasons.

6.    The master may have agreed with the Registrar but this is not known for sure, in law.

7.    Thus, the special leave for the High Court is required.

8.    The facts are that the documents are not an attempt to re-litigate matters that occurred more than 13 years ago as those matters are still alive-and-well with the blessings of Justice Young and Justice Wicks of the Supreme Court of South Australia who disagreed with Justice Martin.

9.    Hence, the High Court of Australia is required to state this is not an abuse of process.

10. Further, the High Court of Australia is required to state that the master must accept the documents and proceed in accordance with due process and allow the Commissioner of Police to have his say and his day in court as to why he has not responded to any letters in 13 years nor provided any new evidence or fresh evidence to the applicant or the Australian law courts.

11. The applicant is unemployed and suffering serious hardship and health issues caused by the abuse of power by the respondent in 2000 to bring a prosecution in malice, ill-will and fraud.

12. The intent of that prosecution was to remove the applicant from police service using any methods possible including all illegal, unlawful and wrongful methods.

13. The applicant states clearly that the prosecution has no merit in law.

14. The prosecution has no jurisdiction whatsoever and is out of jurisdiction and thus the High Court of Australia must address these issues, however the matters must be sent back to the master first, so that the Supreme Court of South Australia can address the issues and the facts.

15. I seek a declaration from the High Court of Australia that this is not an abuse of process.

16. I seek an understanding that if this matter is fraud or a perversion of the court of justice then no person in history can uncover or discover that fraud or conspiracy within 14 days or 28 days as allowed by the rules of the court, and the wheels of justice turn slowly for one good reason and that is so all the evidence and all the facts can be obtained so judgments written are not categorised as frivolous or gibberish.

17. All documents sent to the master for his consideration are attached by example to affidavit for the High Court judges to consider.

18. If the prosecution in 2001 is brought by racial hatred and discrimination then those facts of racial hatred must be gathered and examined before any final judgment is made by the full court of the Supreme Court of South Australia.

19. The applicant seeks waiver of all fees and charges and states he has been unemployed since November 2007.  Health care card 504 090 262K expires 30 June 2015.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SWORN by the deponent at Adelaide in State of South Australia on 14 August 2014.     Before me:   Signature [name and qualification of witness administering oath or affirmation]

Signature of deponent ______________________

 

ACHTUNG FERDINANDS!!, ACHTUNG PANZER!!!!

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA  

ADELAIDE REGISTRY                                                                            No.              of 2014

 

 

BETWEEN:                                                                 TREVOR KINGSLEY FERDINANDS

                                                                                                                                      Appellant

 

                                                                                                                                                and

 

                                                                                                 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

                                                                                                                                 Respondent

 

 

 

APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL

 

1.    The applicant applies for special leave to appeal the whole of the judgment of the master of the Supreme Court of South Australia on 8 August 2014. 

GROUNDS

 

1.    The master erred by not providing lawful and proper reasons for the refusal of the documents.  It appears that the Registrar has made some comments and the master has made some comments but a final judgment has not actually been written or reasons provided.

2.    The master erred by assuming and thinking that these matters were to re-litigate’ a matter when in fact that there is no re-litigation whatsoever and these matters are still alive and well before the courts.

ORDERS SOUGHT

 

1.    That special leave to appeal is granted.

2.    That the appeal is allowed.

3.    That the decision of the master on 8 August 2014 is set aside.

4.    The High Court of Australia lawfully directs the masters to accept the documents for filing in the Adelaide Registry of the Supreme Court of South Australia and set down a date for hearing within 28 days, and furthermore that the appellant serve summons and all other legal documents upon the Supreme Court of South Australia and the respondent within 7 days.

5.    A declaration by the High Court of Australia that this matter is not an abuse of process.

 

Dated 14 August 2014.

Signed:…………………………………..

 

Applicant

 

TO THE RESPONDENT: 

 

Commissioner of Police, 30 Flinders Street, Adelaide S.A. 5000.

 

TAKE NOTICE:  Before taking any step in the proceeding you must, within 14 days after service of this application, enter an appearance in the office of the Registry, in which the application is filed, and serve a copy on the applicant.

 

The Applicant is:

 

Trevor Kingsley Ferdinands

 

The Applicant’s address is:

 

592 Brighton Road, BRIGHTON S.A. 5048.